|
Next
Page
Back
to Table of Contents
| Oil and
Gas |
| Drilling
to Infinity in the Allegheny |

In 1859, Edwin Drake sunk the first
successful oil well in the United States near Titusville, Pennsylvania,
a few miles west of what would eventually become the Allegheny National
Forest. This event dramatically altered the shape of world economics,
not to mention the land. In the decades that followed, oil, and
later natural gas, would be extracted from the Allegheny Plateau
at unprecedented levels, leaving in its wake polluted waters, denuded
lands and ghost towns from a boom and bust economy.
By the time the Allegheny National
Forest was designated in 1923 there were already two major oil fields
on either side of the forest: The Oil City/Franklin area in Venango
County, and Bradford in McKean County. Between these two areas were
scattered wells distributed across a virtually tree-less landscape
that was just beginning to recover from what was at the time the
most intense clearcut logging the world had ever witnessed.
When the federal government began to
purchase lands to create the Allegheny, a conscious decision was
made to only pursue surface ownership. This left the subsurface
rights in the hands of a multitude of individuals and companies
that would continue to influence the management of the Allegheny
for decades to come. This decision would later prove to be at odds
with the purpose for creating the Allegheny, which was specifically
designated for watershed protection.
However, the Allegheny's first supervisor
quickly encouraged the continuation of mineral extraction within
the Allegheny and emphasized the Forest Service's duty to provide
adequate surface access to the private party. This policy continues
today despite laws that have been passed regarding the protection
of public forests. The 1986 Forest Plan for the Allegheny National
Forest clearly defines the current policy of the Forest Service
when it comes to drilling for oil and gas in the national forest:
"The Allegheny National Forest
encourages mineral resource development and works cooperatively
with the private owners to reduce impacts to surface resources...The
Allegheny National Forest policy on private oil and gas development
is to foster a spirit of cooperation between the Forest Service
and the developers to provide both surface and subsurface resource
protection and development. In this atmosphere of cooperation,
financial benefits are greatest for both parties and adverse
environmental effects are reduced." (emphasis added)
The Forest Plan clearly indicates that
the financial incentive incurred for the private developer from
drilling as well as the Forest Service's benefit from increased
road access (at taxpayer expense) combine to serve as the guiding
principle for forest management. It is unclear how "adverse
environmental effects are reduced" under this policy. After
all, it is this policy that has allowed the Allegheny to have more
oil and gas wells than the other 154 national forests combined.
Key to restoring the Allegheny from over a century of intense oil
and gas development is the 1984 Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Act. This
law states that surface owners have the right to file objections
to proposed oil and gas wells, particularly where there is concern
about the proposed drillings' impact to "publicly owned parks,
forests, gamelands and wildlife areas; National or State scenic
rivers; national natural landmarks; habitats of rare and endangered
flora and fauna and other critical communities; historical and archaeological
sites listed on the Federal or State list of historic places."
Since 1984, the Forest Service has
allowed over 3,000 wells to be drilled in the Allegheny National
Forest without ever once filing an objection. Could it be that all
these wells were drilled with the utmost concern for the environment
with no "adverse environmental effects?"
Hardly.
Take the 1987 Oil Spill Conference
held in Baltimore for instance: "In 1985 the U.S. EPA declared
northwestern Pennsylvania to have a major oil spill with multiple
sources. This oil spill is unusual in that, rather than being one
large concentrated spill, it consists of small discharges from thousands
of individual wells, tanks, and ponds, which contribute to a major
environmental problem and make discovery, containment and enforcement
a difficult and complicated task."
The Forest Service recently released
a Roads Analysis Report. Included in that report were several attachments
of maps containing information about roads, including oil and gas
roads. One map reveals that the Sackett oil and gas development
is of a size and road density comparable to the city of Warren,
PA. This is a shameful discovery and is the result of a failure
on behalf of the Forest Service and the DEP to protect the surface.
Allegheny Wild! proposes to phase out
oil and gas developments over a thirty-year period. This allows
time for the Forest Service to solicit Congressional funds for subsurface
acquisition and to establish an effective restoration program to
return areas of development to native forest conditions. In the
short-term there must be immediate protection for the Tionesta Scenic
Area, Tracy Ridge National Recreation Area, North Country National
Scenic Trail, proposed Wilderness Areas, and the Allegheny and Clarion
Wild & Scenic River Corridors.
To do this, the Forest Service must
first solicit the necessary funds from Congress to purchase the
mineral rights beneath these areas of critical public and wildlife
value. While awaiting a response from Congress, the Forest Service
must file objections under Section 202(a) of the Oil and Gas Act
and the DEP must reject permits under Section 205(c) of the Oil
and Gas Act. Once this is done and an effective restoration program
is established, the long-term needs can begin to be addressed including
subsurface acquisition in the remainder of the forest, quality jobs
restoring developments to native forest and cleaning up degraded
watersheds.
|